A statistical investigation of parameters associated with low cell-free fetal DNA fraction in maternal plasma for noninvasive prenatal testing.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is the most common method for prenatal aneuploidy screening. Low fetal fraction (LFF) is the primary reason for NIPT failure. Consequently, factors associated with LFF should be elucidated for optimal clinical implementation of NIPT. METHODS: In this study, NIPT data from January 2019 to December 2022 from the laboratory records and obstetrical and neonatal data from the electronic medical records were collected and analyzed. Subjects with FF >3.50% were assigned to the control group, subjects with FF <3.50% once were assigned to the LFF group, and subjects with FF <3.50% twice were assigned to the repetitive low fetal fraction (RLFF) group. Factors, including body mass index (BMI), gestational age, maternal age, twin pregnancy, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) known to be associated with LFF were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis H test and logistic regression. Clinical data on first trimester pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG), gestational age at delivery, birth weight at delivery, and maternal diseases were obtained from the hospital's prenatal and neonatal screening systems (twin pregnancy was not included in the data on gestational age at delivery and the control group did not include data on maternal diseases.), and were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis H test and Chi-square test. RESULTS: Among the total of 63,883 subjects, 63,605 subjects were assigned to the control group, 197 subjects were assigned to the LFF group, and 81 subjects were assigned to the RLFF group. The median of BMI in the three groups was 22.43 kg/m2 (control), 25.71 kg/m2 (LFF), and 24.54 kg/m2 (RLFF). The median gestational age in the three groups was 130 days (control), 126 days (LFF), and 122/133 days (RLFF). The median maternal age in the three groups was 29 (control), 29 (LFF), and 33-years-old (RLFF). The proportion of twin pregnancies in the three groups was 3.3% (control), 10.7% (LFF), and 11.7% (RLFF). The proportion of IVF in the three groups was 4.7% (control), 11.7% (LFF), and 21.3% (RLFF). The factors significantly associated with LFF included BMI [2.18, (1.94, 2.45), p < 0.0001], gestational age [0.76, (0.67, 0.87), p < 0.0001], twin pregnancy [1.62, (1.02, 2.52), p = 0.0353], and IVF [2.68, (1.82, 3.86), p < 0.0001]. The factors associated with RLFF included maternal age [1.54, (1.17, 2.05), p = 0.0023] and IVF [2.55, (1.19, 5.54), p = 0.016]. Multiples of the median (MOM) value of ß-hCG and pregnant persons' gestational age at delivery were significantly decreased in the LFF and RLFF groups compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: According to our findings based on the OR value, factors associated strongly with LFF include a high BMI and the use of IVF. Factors associated less strongly with LFF include early gestational age and twin pregnancy, while advanced maternal age and IVF were independent risk factors for a second LFF result.

Body mass index, gestational age, maternal age, twin pregnancy, and in vitro fertilization are associated with fetal fraction. We added the repetitive low fetal fraction population and used a large normal population as a control to identify the main factors associated with low fetal fraction.

Patient experiences with prenatal cell-free DNA screening in a safety net setting.

OBJECTIVES: Thirty-five states, including Florida, now cover cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening of fetuses for all pregnant patients enrolled in state public insurance programs. We interviewed Black and Hispanic obstetric patients at a safety net clinic in Florida shortly after the state rolled out cfDNA as a first-tier screening method for publicly insured patients. METHODS: Black and Hispanic patients receiving prenatal care from a prenatal or maternal fetal medicine clinic at a federally qualified health center in Jacksonville, FL were invited to participate in a qualitative interview in English or Spanish to explore experiences and perceptions of prenatal cfDNA screening. Participants were recruited following their first prenatal visit when cfDNA is typically introduced. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed for iterative themes based on principles of grounded theory. RESULTS: One hundred Black and Hispanic patients (n = 51 non-Hispanic Black, n = 43 Hispanic, n = 3 Hispanic Black, n = 3 Not Reported/Other) completed an interview. Participants described minimal opportunity for pre-screening counseling and limited health literacy about cfDNA or its uses. Some believed that cfDNA could positively impact pregnancy health. Many were unsure if they had received cfDNA even though they were aware of the information provided by it. Most participants expressed an interest in cfDNA as a means for early detection of fetal sex and as an additional indication of general fetal health. CONCLUSIONS: Patient experiences indicate limited informed consent and decision-making for cfDNA, discordant with professional guidelines on pre-screen counseling. Our findings suggest that there should be additional investment in implementing cfDNA in safety net settings to ensure that patients and providers receive the support necessary for effective patient counseling and follow-on care for the ethical implementation of cfDNA.

Limited ability of increased sequencing depth in detecting cases missed by noninvasive prenatal testing: a comparative analysis of 3 clinical cases.

Increased sequencing depth can improve the detection rate of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for chromosome aneuploidies and copy number variations (CNVs). However, due to the technical limitations of NIPT, false-positives and false-negatives are inevitable. False-positives for aneuploidy and CNVs have been widely reported, but few missed cases have been reported. In this study, we report 3 patients missed by NIPT, which were still missed after increasing the sequencing depth. To verify the detection efficiency of the platform, the results of NIPT in 32,796 patients treated in Yulin Women and Children Health Care Hospital from 2020 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Data on false-negative cases found by postnatal follow-up or amniocentesis were collected, and the sequencing data, pregnancy examination data, and postnatal follow-up results of these missed patients were summarized. Five patients missed by NIPT were found, and they were missed again by retesting or increasing the sequencing depth. Except for hypospadias found in 1 patient, ultrasonography of the other 4 patients showed no obvious abnormalities during the whole pregnancy. Our results suggest that pregnant women should be fully informed of the benefits and limitations of NIPT before undergoing the examination to avoid unnecessary medical disputes.

Clinical evaluation of noninvasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome aneuploidies in 9,176 Korean pregnant women: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical significance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) in Korean pregnant women. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed NIPT data from 9,176 women with singleton pregnancies referred to the CHA Biotech genome diagnostics center. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) was extracted from maternal peripheral blood, and high-throughput massively parallel sequencing was conducted. Subsequently, the positive NIPT results for SCA were validated via karyotype and chromosomal microarray analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 46 cases were SCA positive after NIPT, including 20, 12, 8, and 6 for Turner, triple X, Klinefelter, and Jacob syndromes, respectively. Among 37 women with invasive prenatal diagnosis, 19 had true positive NIPT results. The overall positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT for detecting SCAs was 51.35%. The PPV was 18.75% for Turner, 88.89% for triple X, 71.43% for Klinefelter, and 60.00% for Jacob's syndromes. NIPT accuracy for detecting sex chromosome trisomies was higher than that for sex chromosome monosomy (P = 0.002). No significant correlation was observed between fetal SCA incidence and maternal age (P = 0.914), except for the borderline significance of Jacob's syndrome (P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed when comparing NIPT and karyotyping validation for fetal SCA according to pregnancy characteristics. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that NIPT can reliably screen for SCAs, and it performed better in predicting sex chromosome trisomies compared with monosomy X. No correlation was observed between maternal age and fetal SCA incidence, and no association was observed between different pregnancy characteristics. The accuracy of these findings requires improvements; however, our study provides an important reference for clinical genetic counseling and further management. Larger scale studies, considering confounding factors, are required for accurate evaluation.

Effect of Uterine Leiomyomas on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Parameters in the First Trimester.

Uterine leiomyomas may affect the performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant individuals with and without leiomyomas undergoing first-trimester cfDNA-based NIPT. Characteristics of NIPT in patients with leiomyomas (n=122) were compared with those in patients without leiomyomas (n=937). Mean fetal fraction was lower in patients with leiomyomas compared with patients without (10.0% vs 11.5%; P =.001); however, the rate of indeterminate results was different only in patients without obesity (body mass index [BMI] lower than 30) (5.3% vs 1.5%; P =0.03). Total cfDNA concentration was higher in patients with leiomyomas ( P =.002), suggesting possible dilution of the fetal fraction. Leiomyoma size did not affect NIPT metrics. In conclusion, uterine leiomyomas are associated with lower fetal fraction and, in patients without obesity, with a higher rate of indeterminate results independent of leiomyoma size.

Prospective prenatal cell-free DNA screening for genetic conditions of heterogenous etiologies.

Prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening uses extracellular fetal DNA circulating in the peripheral blood of pregnant women to detect prevalent fetal chromosomal anomalies. However, numerous severe conditions with underlying single-gene defects are not included in current prenatal cfDNA screening. In this prospective, multicenter and observational study, pregnant women at elevated risk for fetal genetic conditions were enrolled for a cfDNA screening test based on coordinative allele-aware target enrichment sequencing. This test encompasses the following three of the most frequent pathogenic genetic variations: aneuploidies, microdeletions and monogenic variants. The cfDNA screening results were compared to invasive prenatal or postnatal diagnostic test results for 1,090 qualified participants. The comprehensive cfDNA screening detected a genetic alteration in 135 pregnancies with 98.5% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity relative to standard diagnostics. Of 876 fetuses with suspected structural anomalies on ultrasound examination, comprehensive cfDNA screening identified 55 (56.1%) aneuploidies, 6 (6.1%) microdeletions and 37 (37.8%) single-gene pathogenic variants. The inclusion of targeted monogenic conditions alongside chromosomal aberrations led to a 60.7% increase (from 61 to 98) in the detection rate. Overall, these data provide preliminary evidence that a comprehensive cfDNA screening test can accurately identify fetal pathogenic variants at both the chromosome and single-gene levels in high-risk pregnancies through a noninvasive approach, which has the potential to improve prenatal evaluation of fetal risks for severe genetic conditions arising from heterogenous molecular etiologies. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: ChiCTR2100045739 .

Exploring factors impacting haplotype-based noninvasive prenatal diagnosis for single-gene recessive disorders.

Haplotype-based noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) is applicable for various recessive single-gene disorders in proband families. However, a comprehensive exploration of critical factors influencing the assay performance, such as fetal fraction, informative single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) count, and recombination events, has yet to be performed. It is critical to identify key factors affecting NIPD performance, including its accuracy and success rate, and their impact on clinical diagnostics to guide clinical practice. We conducted a prospective study, recruiting 219 proband families with singleton pregnancies at risk for eight recessive single-gene disorders (Duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, phenylketonuria, methylmalonic acidemia, hemophilia A, hemophilia B, non-syndromic hearing loss, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia) at 7-14 weeks of gestation. Haplotype-based NIPD was performed by evaluating the relative haplotype dosage (RHDO) in maternal circulation, and the results were validated via invasive prenatal diagnosis or newborn follow-ups. Among the 219 families, the median gestational age at first blood draw was 8+5 weeks. Initial testing succeeded for 190 families and failed for 29 due to low fetal fraction (16), insufficient informative SNPs (9), and homologous recombination near pathogenic variation (4). Among low fetal fraction families, successful testing was achieved for 11 cases after a redraw, while 5 remained inconclusive. Test failures linked to insufficient informative SNPs correlated with linkage disequilibrium near the genes, with F8 and MMUT exhibiting the highest associated failure rates (14.3% and 25%, respectively). Homologous recombination was relatively frequent around the DMD and SMN1 genes (8.8% and 4.8%, respectively) but led to detection failure in only 44.4% (4/9) of such cases. All NIPD results from the 201 successful families were consistent with invasive diagnostic findings or newborn follow-up. Fetal fraction, informative SNPs count, and homologous recombination are pivotal to NIPD performance. Redrawing blood effectively improves the success rate for low fetal fraction samples. However, informative SNPs count and homologous recombination rates vary significantly across genes, necessitating careful consideration in clinical practice. We have designed an in silico method based on linkage disequilibrium data to predict the number of informative SNPs. This can identify genomic regions where there might be an insufficient number of SNPs, thereby guiding panel design. With these factors properly accounted for, NIPD is highly accurate and reliable.

Haplotype-based noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of methylmalonic acidemia and the discovery of a recurrent pathogenic haplotype associated with c.609G>A.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial for the prognosis of methylmalonic acidemia (MMA). However, research focused on early prenatal diagnosis of MMA is limited. METHODS: A 161.89kb capture panel was designed for selectively enriching highly heterozygous SNPs. Fetal genotypes were inferred using relative haplotype dosage (RHDO) and Bayes factor, followed by invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD) for validation. A core pathogenic haplotype associated with c.609G>A was identified based on the frequency differences between pathogenic and normal haplotypes. RESULTS: We recruited 41 pregnancies at risk of MMA with a median gestational age of 8+2  weeks. The assay success rate of NIPD-MMA for maternal variants was 92.7% (38/41), and after incorporating the paternal result, the overall assay success rate reached 100% (41/41). All NIPD results were concordant with IPD. Notably, a core haplotype (hap_2), comprising 28 SNPs, demonstrates significant enrichment within pathogenic haplotypes bearing the c.609G>A variation. On average, c.609G>A carriers had 22.38 heterozygous loci within these 28 SNPs. CONCLUSION: NIPD-MMA presents a viable choice for early, accurate, and safe prenatal diagnosis. Furthermore, the discovery of the recurrent core pathogenic haplotype provides a novel approach for haplotype phasing and has the potential for realizing proband-independent NIPD in the future.

Improving the accuracy of noninvasive prenatal testing through size-selection between fetal and maternal cfDNA.

OBJECTIVES: In general, fetal cfDNA is shorter than maternal cfDNA, and accuracy of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results can be improved by selecting shorter cfDNA fragments to enrich fetal-derived cfDNA. This study investigated potential improvements in the accuracy of NIPT by performing classification and analysis based on differences in cfDNA size. METHODS: We performed paired-end sequencing to identify size ranges of fetal and maternal cfDNA from 62,374 pregnant women. We then developed a size-selection method to isolate and analyze both fetal and maternal cfDNA, defining fetal-derived cfDNA as less than 150 bp and maternal-derived cfDNA as greater than 180 bp. RESULTS: By implementing size-selection method, the accuracy of NIPT was improved, resulting in an increase in the overall positive predictive value for all aneuploidies from 89.57% to 97.1%. This was achieved by enriching both fetal and maternal-derived cfDNA, which increased fetal DNA fraction while the number of false positives for all aneuploidies was reduced by more than 70%. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the differences in read length between fetal and maternal-derived cfDNA, and selectively enriched both shorter and longer cfDNA fragments for subsequent analysis. Our approach can increase the detection accuracy of NIPT for detecting fetal aneuploidies and reduce the number of false positives caused by maternal chromosomal abnormalities.

Exploration of a Novel Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Approach for Monogenic Disorders Based on Fetal Nucleated Red Blood Cells.

BACKGROUND: Due to technical issues related to cell-specific capture methods, amplification, and sequencing, noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) based on fetal nucleated red blood cells (fNRBCs) has rarely been used for the detection of monogenic disorders. METHODS: Maternal peripheral blood was collected from 11 families with hereditary hearing loss. After density gradient centrifugation and cellular immunostaining for multiple biomarkers, candidate individual fetal cells were harvested by micromanipulation and amplified by whole-genome amplification (WGA). Whole-exome sequencing/whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and Sanger sequencing were performed on the identified fNRBCs to determine the fetal genotype. The impact of single-cell and pooled WGA products on the sequencing quality and results was compared. A combined analysis strategy, encompassing whole-exome sequencing/WGS, haplotype analysis, and Sanger sequencing, was used to enhance the NIPT results. RESULTS: fNRBCs were harvested and identified in 81.8% (9/11) of families. The results of cell-based-NIPT (cb-NIPT) were consistent with those of invasive prenatal diagnosis in 8 families; the coincidence rate was 88.9% (8/9). The combined analysis strategy improved the success of cb-NIPT. The overall performance of pooled WGA products was better than that of individual cells. Due to a lack of alternative fetal cells or sufficient sequencing data, cb-NIPT failed in 3 families. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a novel fNRBC-based NIPT method for monogenic disorders. By combining multiple analysis strategies and multiple fetal cell WGA products, the problem of insufficient genome information in a single cell was remedied. Our method has promising prospects in the field of NIPT for the detection of monogenic disorders.

High sensitivity and specificity in fetal gender identification in the first trimester, using ultrasound and Noninvasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS) in twin pregnancies, a prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Determination of the fetal gender in the first trimester is important in twin pregnancy cases of familial X-linked genetic syndromes and helps determine chorionicity. We assessed and compared the accuracy of first-trimester ultrasound scans, and cell-free fetal DNA (CfDNA) in determining fetal gender in the first trimester of twin pregnancies. METHODS: Women with twin pregnancies were recruited prospectively during the first trimester. Fetal gender was determined using both ultrasound scans and CfDNA screening. Both results were compared to the newborn gender after delivery. RESULTS: A total of 113 women with twin pregnancies were enrolled. There was 100% sensitivity and specificity in Y chromosome detection using CfDNA. Gender assignment using ultrasound in any first-trimester scans was 79.7%. Accuracy level increased from 54.2% in CRL 45-54 mm to 87.7% in CRL 55-67 mm and 91.5% in CRL 67-87 mm. Male fetuses had significantly higher chances of a gender assignment error compared to female fetuses, odds ratio = 23.574 (CI 7.346 - 75.656). CONCLUSIONS: CfDNA is highly sensitive and specific in determining the presence of the Y chromosome in twin pregnancies in the first trimester. Between CRL 55-87 mm, ultrasound scanning offers a highly accurate determination of fetal gender in twin pregnancies.

Prenatal cfDNA Screening for Emanuel Syndrome and Other Unbalanced Products of Conception in Carriers of the Recurrent Balanced Translocation t(11;22): One Laboratory's Retrospective Experience.

Prenatal cell-free DNA screening (cfDNA) can identify fetal chromosome abnormalities beyond common trisomies. Emanuel syndrome (ES), caused by an unbalanced translocation between chromosomes 11 and 22, has lacked a reliable prenatal screening option for families with a carrier parent. A cohort of cases (n = 46) sent for cfDNA screening with indications and/or results related to ES was queried; diagnostic testing and pregnancy outcomes were requested and analyzed. No discordant results were reported or suspected; there were ten true positives with diagnostic confirmation, six likely concordant positives based on known translocations and consistent cfDNA data, and twenty-six true negatives, by diagnostic testing or birth outcomes. For cases with parental testing, all affected ES cases had maternal translocation carriers. Expanded cfDNA may provide reassurance for t(11;22) carriers with screen negative results, and screen positive results appear to reflect a likely affected fetus, especially with a known maternal translocation. Current society guidelines support the use of expanded cfDNA screening in specific circumstances, such as for translocation carriers, with appropriate counseling. Diagnostic testing is recommended for prenatal diagnosis of ES and other chromosome abnormalities in pregnancy. To our knowledge, this cohort is the largest published group of cases with prenatal screening for carriers of t(11;22).

Noninvasive prenatal screening with conventional sequencing depth to screen fetal copy number variants: A retrospective study of 19 144 pregnant women.

AIM: To investigate the detectability of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) with conventional sequencing depth to detect fetal copy number variants. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in a total of 19 144 pregnant women. Their cell-free plasma DNA were assessed for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, sex chromosome aneuploidies, and genome-wide copy number variants by NIPS at conventional sequencing depth. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-four cases (2.0%, 374/19 144) with abnormal results were detected, which including 84 cases (0.4%, 84/19 144) with high risk of trisomy 21, 18, and 13, 90 cases (0.5%, 90/19 144) with high risk of sex chromosome abnormalities (SCA), and 44 cases (0.2%, 44/19 144) with high risk of other chromosome aneuploidies. One hundred fifty-six cases (0.8%, 156/19 144) with high risk of copy number variations (CNVs) were also detected. In following prenatal diagnosis, composite positive predictive value (PPV) of trisomy 21, 18, and 13 was 69.6% (48/69). The PPV of SCAs was 37.3% (19/51). And the PPVs for CNVs was detected as 51.0% (<5 Mb), 71.4% (5 Mb ≤ CNV ≤10 Mb), 56.5% (>10 Mb). Finally, a follow-up about the pregnancy outcomes were conducted for all available cases. CONCLUSIONS: NIPS yielded high PPVs for trisomy 21, 18, and 13 aneuploidies and moderate PPVs for SCAs and CNVs. The screening effectiveness was closely related to the size of CNV fragments. Larger CNVs, especially larger than 5 Mb, could be detected more accurately by NIPS in our analytic technique. Meanwhile, diagnostic confirmation by microarray analysis was highly recommended.

Complete trisomy 9 detected by noninvasive prenatal testing and confirmed by amniocentesis.

Complete chromosome 9 trisomy (T9) is a rare and fatal chromosomal disorder. We performed non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in a patient with threatened abortion symptoms and found that the fetal was at risk for complete chromosome 9 trisomy. This shows that NIPT has certain accuracy in detecting trisomy of chromosome 9, which provide options for prenatal diagnosis of rare chromosomal abnormalities.

Performance of single-gene noninvasive prenatal testing for autosomal recessive conditions in a general population setting.

OBJECTIVE: Carrier screening with reflex to single-gene noninvasive prenatal testing (sgNIPT) is an alternative approach for identifying pregnancies at risk for inherited autosomal recessive conditions without the need for a sample from the reproductive partner. This study is the largest clinical validation of this approach in a general population setting. METHODS: The clinical performance of carrier screening with reflex to sgNIPT for cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy, alpha thalassemias, and beta hemoglobinopathies was assessed by collecting pregnancy outcome data on patients who underwent this testing and comparing the neonatal outcome to the assay-predicted fetal risk. RESULTS: Of 42,067 pregnant individuals who underwent screening, 7538 carriers (17.9%) had reflex sgNIPT, and neonatal or fetal outcomes were obtained for 528 cases, including 25 affected pregnancies. Outcomes demonstrated high concordance with sgNIPT, for example, all pregnancies with 9 in 10 personalized fetal risk results were affected (positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% for the sub-group) and the sgNIPT assay showed a sensitivity of 96.0% (95% CI: 79.65%-99.90%), specificity of 95.2% (95% CI: 92.98%-96.92%), average PPV of 50.0% (95% CI: 35.23%-64.77%), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.8% (95% CI: 98.84%-99.99%). The end-to-end performance of carrier screening with reflex to sgNIPT was calculated to have a sensitivity of 92.4% and specificity of 99.9%, which are unaffected by partner carrier screening or misattributed paternity unlike a traditional carrier screening workflow, which has a 35% sensitivity and a maximum of 25% PPV (1 in 4) in a real-life setting. CONCLUSION: This study builds upon earlier findings to confirm that carrier testing with reflex to sgNIPT is highly accurate for general population screening. Given this high accuracy and an NPV of 99.8%, this workflow should be considered as an option for most of the general pregnant population. When the biological partner sample is unavailable, this workflow should be recommended as the first-line approach.

Clinical Potential of Expanded Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Detection of Aneuploidies and Microdeletion/Microduplication Syndromes.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of expanded noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT-Plus) for the detection of aneuploidies and microdeletion/microduplication syndromes. METHODS: A total of 7177 pregnant women were enrolled in the study from June 2020 to March 2022 at Xijing Hospital, China. Cases with NIPT-Plus-positive results were further confirmed by chromosomal karyotyping and a chromosomal microarray analysis. RESULTS: A total of 112 positive cases (1.56%) were identified by NIPT-Plus, including 60 chromosome aneuploidies and 52 microdeletion/microduplication syndromes. Ninety-five cases were validated by amniocentesis, and 57 were confirmed with true-positive results, comprising 18 trisomy 21, 4 trisomy 18, 1 trisomy 13, 17 sex chromosome aneuploidies, 1 other aneuploidy, and 16 microdeletion/microduplication syndromes. The positive predictive value of total chromosomal abnormalities was 60% (57/95). For trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, sex chromosome aneuploidies, other aneuploidies and microdeletion/microduplication syndromes, the sensitivity was all 100%, the specificity was 100, 99.986, 100, 99.888, 99.958, and 99.636%, and the positive predictive value was 100, 80, 100, 68, 25, and 38.10%, respectively. For all clinical characteristics, the abnormal maternal serum screening group was found to have the highest prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities (1.54%), and the ultrasound abnormality group presented the highest positive predictive value (73.33%). CONCLUSIONS: NIPT-Plus has great potential for the detection of aneuploidies and microdeletion/microduplication syndromes owing to its high sensitivity, safety, and specificity, which greatly reduces unnecessary invasive procedures and the risk of miscarriage and allows informed maternal choice.

Preliminary study of noninvasive prenatal screening for 22q11.2 deletion/duplication syndrome using multiplex dPCR assay.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish a cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) assay using multiplex digital PCR (dPCR) for identifying fetuses at increased risk of 22q11.2 deletion/duplication syndrome. METHODS: Six detection sites and their corresponding probes were designed for the 22q11.2 recurrent region. A dPCR assay for the noninvasive screening of 22q11.2 deletion/duplication syndrome was established. A total of 130 plasma samples from pregnant women (including 15 samples with fetal 22q11.2 deletion/duplication syndrome) were blindly tested for evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of the established assay. RESULTS: DNA with different sizes of 22q11.2 deletion/duplication was detected via dPCR, indicating that the designed probes and detection sites were reasonable and effective. In the retrospective clinical samples, 11 out of 15 samples of pregnant women with 22q11.2 deletion/duplication were detected during the cffDNA assay, and accurate regional localization was achieved. Among the 115 normal samples, 111 were confirmed to be normal. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used for assessing the cut-off values and AUC for these samples. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive as well as negative predictive values were 73.3%, 96.5%, 73.3%, and 96.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The cffDNA assay based on dPCR technology for the noninvasive detection of 22q11.2 recurrent copy number variants in fetuses detected most affected cases, including smaller but relatively common nested deletions, with a low false-positive rate. It is a potential, efficient and simple method for the noninvasive screening of 22q11.2 deletion/duplication syndrome.

Developing and validating noninvasive prenatal testing for de novo autosomal dominant monogenic diseases in Vietnam.

Background: Over 60% of single-gene diseases in newborns are autosomal dominant variants. Noninvasive prenatal testing for monogenic conditions (NIPT-SGG) is cost-effective and timesaving, but not widely applied. This study introduces and validates NIPT-SGG in detecting 25 monogenic conditions. Methods: NIPT-SGG with a 30-gene panel applied next-generation sequencing and trio assays to confirm de novo variants. Diagnostic tests confirmed NIPT-detected cases. Results: Among 93 pregnancies with ultrasound findings, 11 (11.8%) fetuses were screened and diagnosed with monogenic diseases, mostly with Noonan syndrome. NIPT-SGG determined >99.99% of actual positive and negative cases, confirmed by diagnostic tests. No false-negatives or false-positives were reported. Conclusion: NIPT-SGG effectively identifies the fetuses affected with monogenic diseases, which is a promisingly safe and timely antenatal screening option for high-risk pregnancies.